User talk:Dante Alighieri

DO NOT SPAM MY TALK PAGE

Archived talk: Clovis et al., AE/BE issues (french fries), Archive 1, Archive 2, Archive 3, Archive 4, Archive 5.

---

FNORD

(I don't THINK this is Spam...) Hi! This is Icarus!, being non-Wiki (I'm not logged in...), saying thanx for the work on the Discordianism page! Keep it up!24.176.20.60 16:23, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Korak according to Wold Newton

Korak, born as John Drummond (I), is the son of Roger Drummond and brother of Hugh "Bulldog" Drummond. For some reason Roger Drummond could not keep John, and John Clayton III adopted John Drummond (I). So while Korak is a son of Tarzan, he is not the biological son of Tarzan. If I remember right the reason the Wold Newton researchers had a problem with Korak being the son of Tarzan was that Tarzan would have been 12 when Korak was born or something like that. Just FYI.
—Lady Aleena talk/contribs 01:43, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Believe me, the Wold Newton setting is vast and convoluted. However, Korak was not mentioned by the originator of the setting, and that is why he was not mentioned in the main article. He is on the list however, so he is not forgotten. You should take a look at just how many characters from so many sources have all been interconnected by this setting and its imaginative collaborators. - LA @ 08:00, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Re: FP delist closing procedure

Hi Dante!
Yeah, a delist nom is like the reverse to a nomination nom. For a picture to be dilisted it needs a 2/3 majority. So if the results were 10 delist 5 keep it would be a delist, but if it were 10 delist 6 keep it is retained. --Fir0002 07:53, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Hummingbird Hawk-moth FPC

Hi! You supported the Hummingbird Hawk-moth FPC (like everyone else who commented), but HighInBC uploaded an edit that absolutely no-one commented on. I can't promote the image without knowing which version to promote, so now I have to ask everyone which version they prefer. Would you mind specifying which image you are supporting? Thanks. Raven4x4x 09:28, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Fremont/Hayward

Hey, I'm currently living in Livermore. Are there any local Wikipedia meetups? We have one in Goettingen every other month and the Bay Area is a lot bigger... --Dschwen 16:03, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

I've been here for two months now, but I'm leaving on e 25th. This might be a bit to short to start up a whole new meet-up. Well, maybe it's worth a try.--Dschwen 16:43, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Request of Help: moderation

The article about Boscovich is NPOV due to nationalistic ideas. I've tried to mark it as NPOV several times, but the user User: Ante Perkovic always deleted it. My idea is that the article should be marked NPOV, than rewritten in a neutral way, presenting all the points of view. Thank you.

--Giovanni Giove 19:27, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Re: Canon Lens Equipment

Hi Dante!
That's extremely generous of you! I'll bear that in mind on any future purchases. Thanks! --Fir0002 12:42, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Hangman

Hi Dante, I started a new round at Wikipedia:WikiHangman_Tournament/Tournament_1/Match_6/Round_2/B.

Why'd you delete my entry

I just submitted an entry for the music genre Swordmetal. You deleted it less than 10 minutes after I submitted it claiming it was nonsense. That is an obviously ignorant claim, since the genre clearly exists whether you listen to it or not.

I do not appreciate you deleting my submissions without researching the topic at hand. You don't know everything and that quick delete was apparently a "if Dante doesn't know about it, it doesn't belong on Wiki" act.

People like you make the Internet frustrating. I'm going to resubmit the entry and I suggest you mind your own business, or, if you're just that determined to ensure Wiki is filled with legit content, LOOK UP THE GENRE BEFORE YOU DELETE IT!

--Sean Cannon

Re: 85mm lens photo

Hi Dante!
Yeah no worries, I was kinda surprised it was promoted, and although I disagree with the rationale behind "ad shot" opposes, I agree that there was no way that the consensus was in favour of a promote. Thanks, --Fir0002 00:15, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

APBT

hello dante-

i don't know who you are, but i like tuttle :)

i wanted to ask you if he is a rescue or if you bought him from a breeder, if a breder, i am interested in his ped. or just the kennel name if you don't mind.

i am an apbt freak and spend a large amount of my time studying the history and peds of well bred dogs.

I have an apbt mix currently and am expectign a new pup after 2007. i really like tuttle's looks and headset, and would appreciate any info you would like to share.

you can post here or contact me privately @ dizzyvinyl@aol.com

thanks for your time. Vanessa (dizzyvinyl)

AN/I

Please see [1] where I have have enacted the proposed solution by emailing Taxman my new nick to distribute to who he wishes as he sees fit. Jtkiefer ^talk 08:30, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Klimt caption

See User_talk:Atomaton#Masturbation_page_vandalism. All fixed now.

WP:WHMT

We need some more people for the second Wikipedia:WikiHangman Tournament. If you are interested, add your name to the "waiting list" (who will all play because we have a lack of people -- the "waiting list" is only for show). Just thought I'd give you a heads-up. Also, the rules have been modified, so that may be of value. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka Talk to me! 23:45, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Klopman Diamond

Hi, you added that Myron Cohen was the originator of the Klopman Diamond gag, but on that entry page, it says the joke is traditional and has apparently been around for a long time. If so, it wouldn't have an originator of relatively recent vintage, and furthermore, you haven't sourced your Myron Cohen claim. I'm not saying you're wrong to put this in there, but it needs sourcing - and both pages need to be consistent and even NPOV. If you have the source, then the joke page needs to say it's not traditional, or that it became traditional after being written by Cohen. Bruxism 02:51, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

I like your suggestion (on my talk page). If it's really in the oral tradition, finding an "originator" will be hard to do. Bruxism 23:48, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Your opinion, please

Hi! We welcome your opinion, or participation on Wikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality/WIP-image-guidelines where we are attempting to develop useful guidelines to help solve a variety of problems. Atom 15:11, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Hermes

Hi, I actually split the paragraph in two in this edit and added information, correcting a bit (I had some time and made a trip to the library to dig up the primary sources - it is the only way you can ever be sure of anything when dealing with the classics, and even then you are at a handicap if you do not have the original language). Haiduc 01:11, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

I got it off the Wikipedia Herma article, but I have not yet found anything to back that up, nor has the original poster. If you find anything supporting it please let me know. Haiduc 23:32, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Willamette Meteorite

Thanks for sprucing up that page. I tried, via a quick Google search, to find a reference to what was happening in that older photo so I could provide a meaningful caption, but I failed. :) It appears to be from the day they moved the meteorite to the museum. Thanks for fixing it. Happy editing! Katr67 02:42, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Bronx Zoo

Hi Dante, thanks for the message. And yes indeed, they both are the same bird (I only saw one) :) Also, your image of the Palawan Peacock Pheasant is awesome!! I'm jealous ... LOL. Couple times there, those pheasant keep hiding from me. I put it on taxobox and wikicommons Bronx Zoo, if you don't mind. Any chance, you took picture of Green Junglefowl? I only have female (never saw the male, so far ..). --Stavenn 01:01, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

I don't know much about photography, but your pic is sharp enough to me. Considering that the bird is very hyper, hides a lot and the place is pretty dark. You capture the bird' whole body and its metallic blue feathers, nice pose too :) ... If you have images of Mariana Fruit-dove, St. Vincent Parrot, Pheasant Pigeon and Wattled Curassow of Bronx Zoo, it would be a great additions on Wiki. Thanks :P --Stavenn 02:20, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Yes, I noticed :) Thanks a lot ... hehe. Your pics are great !! I never got decent picture of that birds in the zoo (that's why I requested). Palawan Peacock Pheasant, Mariana and Pheasant Pigeon loves to hide in the dark, St. Vincent hides in top corner and Wattled Curassow way down low. You did great capturing clear pics of those birds. Your pigeon is not lousy at all, are you kidding me. Mine is all dark, can't see the birds .. whenever I cleared the image, the Pheasant Pigeon became a new species: Black Pigeon instead .. LOL. Someday, I will take good pics of those birds like yours. Thanks again and have a great weekend ! --Stavenn 01:01, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Announcement

Announcement The "Help name my baby" Poll has closed :). Greta Annette was born 12/12/06. She weighs 6lbs 14oz and is 19inches long. Mother and baby are both doing fine. Thanks for all the suggestions! To keep this slightly Wikipedia related I have started Adopt a State, so adopt your state article today!

I'm trying to straighten something out.

Follow the link to your edit here. It goes to a porn site. So I thought it's a joke. I think an apology's in order, but I need to get to the bottom of this. My apology in advance. Xiner (talk, email) 00:08, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

If you have AIM, my username is AngelusOfGalway. I'm really sorry as it looks like a huge misunderstanding. I first went to your link and it went to a porn site. Then it was fluid dynamics. I'm trying to figure out how that happened, but it caused my vandal radar to go crazy. You must be the calmest guy alive judging by your reactions to my actions. Xiner (talk, email) 00:14, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

No problems, it was an honest mistake, made all the more easy by some VERY shady dealings on the part of the new owner of the website. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 00:21, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Ok, it's not as entertaining as I thought. I definitely missed a few red lights there. Mea culpa. But anyway, here are the uncensored facts of what happened. Xiner (talk, email) 02:46, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Ok, I've corrected the misinfo I put in wiktionary. Thanks. Xiner (talk, email) 21:12, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Oh ok. It worked out well though b/c I checked out that archived discussion and found the meaning of that cryptic Chinese character. It means baiji, not dolphin as I'd inserted into wiktionary. Xiner (talk, email) 00:07, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Happy New Year (and a request)

Hello again. I'd like to delete Two of Hearts and was wondering if you could help. Before I tried to straighten out the disambig situation there today, it was a disambig page that links to a) the Playing card and b) the Two of Hearts (song). Confusingly, Two of hearts redirecte to Playing card, despite the fact that placing a disambig in Playing card would look a bit odd. If you could delete Two of Hearts, then Two of Hearts (song) could be moved there. I've already placed the disambig link to Playing card in Two of Hearts (song). Thanks.

Oh, and happy new year. Xiner (talk, email) 01:17, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi again. I've decided that I should wait a few more months for RfA. Sorry for the change of mind. Xiner (talk, email) 00:26, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Hmm...A third and fourth nomination offer came, and it doesn't feel right to reject them. Could you be so kind as to contribute to the RfA? I promise, this time I'll go through with it. Xiner (talk, email) 16:24, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Oooh, Dante, you're being too humble, or I wasn't clear enough. I was asking for your co-nomination statement, which you'd offered. I don't want people to think I'm canvassing for support here. :) Xiner (talk, email) 21:52, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

You can find my reply on my talk page

You've left a comment on my talk page and I've replied. Please read my talk page again. Morris Munroe 16:17, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

talk:Reality

No, I only supported keeping protection for the article talk at the current moment. If the article's protection expires in 2 days, then also unprotect the talk page at that date. Nishkid64 14:37, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Impunv block

You blocked Impunv (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) for violating 3RR. I don't see any previous warning on his talk page - is there a previous history to this user? Yuser31415 21:11, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

He's certainly disruptive, but you blocked him for edit warring. Perhaps clarifying the block message might help. Yuser31415 21:24, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Yes, no problems. I added a second block message. Good luck, Yuser31415 21:29, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Golden-Road.net on Deletion review

Hola!

A request to clarify deletion was posted on Deletion review. I endorse overtuning the deletion and rewrite because I remember reading the page that was originally deleted was heavily biased. It said to notify the latest user responsible, so here you go. NoInsurance (chat?) 13:22, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Thats not quite right

Actually, i was placing the {{db-copyright}} on that page because looking at Mets studio and the article, the information was created almost word-for-word or as an advertisment. I did not create this page, if you look at the history. If you are referring to the talk page, that was an accident as i thought the template had to be placed there for the article to be deleted. Sorry. This comes from placing so many other templates on talk pages e.g. {{Move|Blah}} Simply south 19:41, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

No worries. Simply south 19:43, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Some durable vandalism

Please look at Baptists specifically chapter 1.4, Baptists in the United States. An inappropriate term appears in the subheader. It doesn't appear in my edit window. 1. How did it get there? 2. How do I remove it? (I can't claim to agree with these folks, but that is no reason to let their page get vandalized.) RPellessier | Talk 21:49, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Gone now, vanished. It said, "poopy." I couldn't find the edit that put it in, or the one that removed it. RPellessier | Talk 08:44, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

User:Dante Alighieri

User:Dante Alighieri is me! --Dante Alighieri | Talk 19:13, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

RAID image on commons

Consider uploading it to En Wiki under fair use. I don't give it high chances on Commons. meta:copyright paranoia is too strong there.-- _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk}  03:51, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

My RfA

Hi "Dante". What can I say? You're a wonderful admin, putting up with my porn-paranoia, dallying, and during the trial, stressful rants. Hopefully, this thank-you note will go some way in remedying that. Rest assured that I have heard every voice loud and clear during the discussion, and will strive to use the mop carefully and responsibly. Thank you for your support, and please don't hesitate to let me know how I am doing anytime. Xiner (talk, email) 00:12, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Fringe science . . .

Just thought you should know, a rather fringe wikipedian has been taking liberties with the Fringe Science article. I reverted it to its status before he got to it, but it had sat in the modified version for about a month before I discovered it. Pschelden 10:39, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

"There is nothing more irritating"

That was highly amusing. While I grant that I did bait GN a bit, he was kind of pushing it. — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] ツ 00:49, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

RFA Thanks

I would like to thank you for your support in my recent RFA. As you may or may not be aware, it passed with approximately 99% support. I ensure you that I will use the tools well, and if I ever disappoint you, I am open to recall. If you ever need anything, don't hesitate to leave me a note on my talkpage. Thanks again, ^demon^{[omg plz]} 20:35, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Re: Trent Lott photos

Yes, you're right. I did note that the user is of questionable reliability on the majority of the images, but I didn't on some of the earlier ones I tagged. --Tom (talk - email) 12:30, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

User:Tim Pope

Hello! I have unblocked this user, as I know him and this is his real name and he's told me he intends on being constructive. —Signed, your friendly neighborhood MessedRocker. 21:01, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Crookedvinelabel.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Crookedvinelabel.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:51, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Bigwhitehouselabel.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bigwhitehouselabel.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:17, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Bentcreeklabel.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bentcreeklabel.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:36, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Martí - Artesa.jpg

Hello, Dante Alighieri. An automated process has found and will an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that is in your userspace. The image (Image:Martí - Artesa.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Dante Alighieri/images. This image or media will be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. This does not necessarily mean that the image is being deleted, or that the image is being removed from other pages. It is only being removed from the page mentioned above. All mainspace instances of this image will not be affected Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 20:56, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Missing image Image:EngrishSweatshirt.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:EngrishSweatshirt.jpg, by Strangerer, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:EngrishSweatshirt.jpg is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:EngrishSweatshirt.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:EngrishSweatshirt.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 11:43, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Martí_-_Artesa.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Martí_-_Artesa.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 11:14, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

What is considered as a racial slur

I am trying to understand the wiki's NPOV that covers this problem. I understand you could be right person to ask more about this problem.

E.g. Having a topic with content that could be probably hurting people who belong to a certain community as mentioned at nigger. Can you kindly explain me if this article that is talking about certain race would not be probably hurting the sentiments of the people belonging to that community?

What exactly does this NPOV actually stand for. I hardly understand it.BalanceRestored 13:04, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

citation-needed in Caffeine

I see you added a {{fact}} to the Caffeine article. I removed it because to added it to a complex sentence that makes several distinct factual statements without making clear which part(s) concerned you. Feel free to re-add a tag in a more specific way and start a section on the Talk:Caffeine page to clarify what isn't clear. Make sure you read the several previous discussions in the talk-page archives where the alternative names were discussed. DMacks 21:28, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of JBOD

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A {{prod}} template has been placed on JBOD, by 132.205.44.5 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}.

Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Grim Reaper Bot 07:02, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Please help with Wikipedia:Conspiracy theory titles

I would appreciate any help you could provide with the new Wikipedia:Conspiracy theory titles proposal/essay and also over on wiktionary's definition of "conspiracy theory" here. zen master T 23:12, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Bentcreeklabel.gif

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Bentcreeklabel.gif. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:18, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 16:18, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Frog-size Image Removal

Howdy. A while ago you methodically removed [this image] from all the articles which used it. I'm not entirely sure why as you left no edit summaries. The image's main page has a list of references in the section titled 'references' if that was your only concern.

Anyways,in the future, you might want to give the image creator/uploader (in this case, me/me) a holler beforehand, unless the rationale is obvious. Thanks, --Xiaphias 04:36, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Possible image mis-use

Hi Dante,
Thanks a lot for the heads up - and yes you should head over to FPC! --Fir0002 07:48, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Decimation (Roman Army)

At last, a response! I was wondering if I was talking to myself, here. Thank you!
There is so much dubious stuff on this page, I’m wondering if I should just be bold and start deleting things. Ideas? Xyl 54 (talk) 17:58, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Ancient Egypt map.svg

I added a date bracket to the image description page of Image:Ancient Egypt map.svg. Does this work better now? Thanks Jeff Dahl (Talk • contribs) 19:32, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Holy Basil FPC

Hi Thanks for your vote at FPC. After the addition of edit 2, do you reconsider your vote? Regards Muhammad Mahdi Karim (talk) 03:30, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

School

Hi, I'm doing a school report on you and your work and I have a few questions for you, if you could answer them that would be great: 1. How was your work influenced by Classical masters (eg Virgil)? 2. What personal and/or political views are expressed in your writing? THANKS —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.236.129.147 (talk) 04:06, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Hehe... bonus points for humor. ;) --Dante Alighieri | Talk 00:57, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Dugong - underside.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Dugong - underside.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:15, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Dugong - profile.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Dugong - profile.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:15, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Ledger

The backslash was left off of the "Deathcite" ref in "Death" - should be <ref name="deathcite /> . The rest of the article is bombed. thanks Tvoz |talk 22:23, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

never mind - it was caught Tvoz |talk 22:24, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Protection

Making sure you saw that the protection level on Heath Ledger didn't stick. - Philippe | Talk 22:33, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Ugh, well, if things get bad again, I'll just re-protect. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 22:34, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Boy, I sure wish he'd discussed before changing the protection level. <sigh> - Philippe | Talk 22:35, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

I just made a comment to that extent on his Talk page. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 22:36, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!

Hi there, I found your user page by way of Google, and wanted to thank you. I collect quotations, too, but you've really shown me a thing or two about how it's done. Those are some fine selections. Are they simply from your reading? Be well, Ipsenaut (talk) 15:15, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Reywas

Hi. I noticed your messages to his page. I think you shouldn't let him rile you. He's a solid, good-faith editor. He has some kind of a hang-up about quotation marks, removing them willy-nilly just about wherever he finds them. He doesn't recognize scare quotes or use–mention distinction. Whenever he sees quotation marks, he thinks they're typos and deletes them. He may fight you on this on articles but he probably won't edit your user page again. Let me know if there's anything I can do to help mediate the situation. Robert K S (talk) 01:25, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Superdelegates

You say it's simple math implying anyone can do the equation themselves... but where is the number for the voting population? How can I do this "simple math" if I don;t have all the numbers involved? X/2 may equal 4 but you still have to cite that x actually is 8.--Dr who1975 (talk) 20:26, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Aquafina500mL.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Aquafina500mL.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:15, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bent Creek Winery

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Bent Creek Winery, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Agne^Cheese/^Wine 02:22, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Old draft article

Hey Dante,

Following a few "what links here" pages I found Talk:AIDS alternative origin theories/rewrite. There hasn't been any work done on it since 20:14, August 12, 2005...I thought I'd drop a line and see if you're planning to do anything with it. If not, deletion seems appropriate. Cheers, — Scientizzle 19:55, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Re: File:Martí - Artesa.jpg

I have reduced the image a bit more, sorry for not being specific, I didn't mean to offend, and apologise. :( — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 19:03, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Message about relicensing GFDL images

I have added a message at Commons:User:Dante Alighieri --Tony Wills (talk) 02:22, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Universum University

I saw you removed the copyright CSD from Universum University as being "unclear copyright status". What am I missing? ttonyb1 (talk) 17:06, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

usurpation request on pl-wiki

Hi, I submitted your usurpation request on your behalf. THe user has 7 days to object. Cheers! Pundit|utter 07:23, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

usurp huwikt

You've got mail - see my talk page. --grin ✎ 15:12, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Copyright Query

Dear Dante,

I am emailing from a documentary company in England called Parthenon Entertainment and we would love to use the following image within our documentary series entitled Mystery Files.

Henri_II_of_France_-_Limoges.jpg

We were wondering if you own the copyright to this image as we would like to use it within our documentary for the rights for worlwide, all media and for perpetuity.

If you can email me at: emily.rudge@parthenonentertainment.com or call me on 01923 286 886 that would be great!

Many thanks,

Emily. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Emily Rudge (talk • contribs) 16:09, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

hallo from Uwe Kils

can you please vote again on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Uwe_Kils_(3rd_nomination). Best wishes Uwe Kils 13:43, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Review of closure process 2

Because you've contributed to FPC either recently or in the past, I'm letting you know about the above poll on the basis of which we may develop proposals to change our procedures and criteria. Regards, Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 09:39, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

the Public Policy Initiative Assessment Team wants You!

Hi Dante Alighieri, I got your name from the Editorial Team participant list, and wanted to tell you that we will be testing out assessment metrics in the Wikiproject: United States Public Policy, and I was hoping you would be interested in assessing articles with the Public Policy Initiative. There is more info about assessment on the 9/13/2010 Signpost. If you're interested or just curious you can sign up on the project page or just contact me. Thanks! (PS - I collect quotes too, and enjoyed many on your user page.) ARoth (Public Policy Initiative) (talk) 21:51, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Antiquarian booksellers

Problem you do one - check the rest - they are very poorly provided with WP:RS if any at all - which is why I left the list that you removed - there should have been a bookseller and book trade work group in the books project to fix some weird and wonderful issues - but have not time to think of such things any more SatuSuro 23:35, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Moon jelly - adult (rev2).jpg

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:Moon jelly - adult (rev2).jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Jujutacular talk 17:02, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cc-by-nc-sa-2.0-dual

Template:Cc-by-nc-sa-2.0-dual has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 03:12, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

answering an old question...

So a while ago you asked what Canto and line was depicted in the "Dante & Virgil in Hell" painting by Bouguereau. I was wondering the same thing so I looked it up, and I believe it's from Canto VII, lines 112-114 ("They smote each other not alone with hands,/But with the head and with the breast and feet,/Tearing each other piecemeal with their teeth"). Just letting you know, on the off chance you were still wondering :)

Lily~Camilla <3 (talk) 23:03, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Replies to yours about Carson Mansion

Greetings.... Replies have been left to your notes at Carson Mansion and User talk:Norcalal regarding your suggestions about notable landmarks in North Coast (California). Would you be so kind to see if the new phrasing of the Carson Mansion page (and new citation to Library of Congress) eases the issues you had with the lede to that page? I have attempted to avoid WP:NOR and therefore did not modify either the Golden Gate Bridge or the Fort Ross pages based on your comments. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:57, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for making the change to Carson Mansion. I am a bit confused, however, as I didn't suggest any changes being made to either the GGB or the FR pages. What did you have in mind? --Dante Alighieri | Talk 20:33, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Finished the changes to the Carson Mansion page but did not change other pages per your comments about GGB & FR being the most significant landmark(s) north of Sand Fran. As for your comment on my talk page, I have reviewed my replies to your comments on those pages and do not find them to be "condescending and inaccurate" as you stated on my page. I'm sorry you have some bug in your ear about all this. Perhaps take a few days off or something - get some perspective. You were very abrupt and not at all funny in the initial comments on the Carson Mansion page and NorCalAl's page, now you're starting it up with me. I fail to see the need to be anything other than professional on Wiki and merely informed you of the actions taken after the comments you left on various pages. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:47, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

You're still doing it. You know quite well that I wasn't suggesting that any changes be made to the GGB and FR pages as being more notable than CM, I was pointing out other rational landmarks that could reasonably be considered recognizable to provide a counterpoint to the (at that point) OR claim about CM. If I have a "bug in my ear" it's because you have consistently been condescending and either have very poor reading comprehension or are willfully misinterpreting what I've written - I don't take kindly to that. Also, why did you point out that I wasn't funny? Who's trying to be funny? I'm trying to improve the 'pedia. I made a note about OR that seemed to fail even at a basic level of reasonableness and asked for citations... the text has been changed and it's properly sourced... how is this at all an issue? --Dante Alighieri | Talk 18:31, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

MSU Interview

Dear Dante,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the community HERE, were it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:

• Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
• Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
• All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
• All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
• The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your name HERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) 02:48, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Genealogical relationships of Presidents of the United States for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Genealogical relationships of Presidents of the United States is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genealogical relationships of Presidents of the United States until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. PaoloNapolitano 09:39, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Happy Birthday (2012)

Wishing Dante Alighieri a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee! Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 00:40, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Photo usage

Hi, I've been working on a small game built around animal quizzes and I wanted to let you know I've used one of your pictures.

I found your picture here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Palawan_Peacock_Pheasant_-_male.jpg

And I attributed the picture like this: Dante Alighieri with this link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dante_Alighieri and also added a link to the license: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:GNU_Free_Documentation_License_1.2

I hope you're happy with it, please let me know if this is not the case. You can find the game here: http://apps.facebook.com/animalalbum Or through here: http://www.facebook.com/pages/AnimalAlbum/156339584490672

Kind regards, Garfunkel Jansen (talk) 10:50, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

P.S. Thanks for taking the picture and making it available.

Orphaned non-free media (File:Concannonlabel.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Concannonlabel.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:27, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

The Olive Branch: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1)

Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.

Steven Zhang's Fellowship Slideshow

In this issue:

• Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
• Research: The most recent DR data
• Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
• Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
• DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
• Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
• Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?

Read the entire first edition of The Olive Branch -->

--The Olive Branch 18:57, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

POTD notification

POTD

Hi Dante,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Moon jelly - adult (rev2).jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on October 1, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-10-01. —howcheng {chat} 17:22, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Genealogical relationships of Presidents of the United States for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Genealogical relationships of Presidents of the United States is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genealogical relationships of Presidents of the United States (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dougweller (talk) 18:51, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genealogical relationships of Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom

As this article says "This page is intended to reflect the page Genealogical relationships of Presidents of the United States." I am notifying all those who !voted in the AfD for that article about this AfD discussion. Dougweller (talk) 21:55, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wila (lichen), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sahaptin and Nez Perce (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Nickel-Iron-Meteorite-Slice.jpg

Hi Dante! The description of the image File:Nickel-Iron-Meteorite-Slice.jpg does not contain the name of the meteorite. Is it a "Campo del Cielo" slice? Odessa? -- Basilicofresco (msg) 08:18, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Invitation to WikiProject Breakfast

Hello, Dante Alighieri. You are invited to join WikiProject Breakfast, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of breakfast-related topics. To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000(talk) 17:39, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Viral phenomenon

The article Viral phenomenon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NEOLOGISM and WP:NOTABILITY and comprises mainly of WP:ORIGINAL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SarahStierch (talk) 15:58, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Request for comment

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Hemp

Hello, could you as an administrator please have a look here and help out, thanks. HempFan (talk) 20:39, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi Dante Alighieri Greetings; re; location of Icon

Do you know where the location of the icon/pic of Constantine/Bishops/Nicea is actually housed?

TY!

markg — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.184.67.104 (talk) 15:58, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection

Hello, Dante Alighieri. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

• Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
• A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:32, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

A new user right for New Page Patrollers

Hi Dante Alighieri.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Dante Alighieri. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Dante Alighieri. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter - February 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67

Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

• A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
• Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
• Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news

• When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
• Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
• The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries

• JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

---

Discuss this newsletter • Subscribe • Archive

13:38, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Dante Alighieri. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:MultiLicenseWithCC-ByNCSA

Template:MultiLicenseWithCC-ByNCSA has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. 2A02:C7F:9659:4500:AD9E:5801:81C:7CD9 (talk) 20:57, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dante Alighieri. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dante Alighieri. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 special circular

Administrators must secure their accounts The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised. Use strong, unique passwords for your Wikipedia account and associated email Change your password now if your Wikipedia account password or email password is reused on another website, exposed, or weak Enable two-factor authentication now for improved security

View additional information

Why have I received this message? All administrators are receiving it. What prompted you to send this message? Recently, several Wikipedia admin accounts were compromised. The admin accounts were desysopped on an emergency basis. In the past, the Committee often resysopped admin accounts as a matter of course once the admin was back in control of their account. The committee has updated its guidelines. Admins may now be required to undergo a fresh Request for Adminship (RfA) after losing control of their account. What do I need to do? Only to follow the instructions in this message. Check that your password is unique (not reused across sites). Check that your password is strong (not simple or guessable). Enable Two-factor authentication (2FA), if you can, to create a second hurdle for attackers. How can I find out more about two-factor authentication (2FA)? You can find out more about 2FA at m:2FA.

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:14, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

APBT

Hi! I saw tuttel on your page and was wondering if you had adopted her from a rescue or bought her from a breeder? I’ve been looking for reputable breeders for APBT and was curious if you had if you had a kennel name. Regardless she sure is stunning. I’m interested in APBT and learning more about them and their history. Thank you!

Madilynxdavid (talk) 03:16, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:03, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Administrator activity policy update

Hello, Dante Alighieri. This message is to let you know about a change to the administrator policy:

The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.

Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:

1. Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
2. Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period

Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work. — xaosflux ^Talk 20:31, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of January 2023.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 08:35, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

"Giant wombat" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Giant wombat has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 2 § Giant wombat until a consensus is reached. Hemiauchenia (talk) 03:42, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Administrative permissions and inactivity reminder

This is a reminder that established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:20, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:21, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Administrative permissions and inactivity reminder

This is a reminder that established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:21, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC)