Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here.

Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention. Important! The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s). The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future. If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section: * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~ Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing. This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action. You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

This page was last updated at 07:50 on 10 November 2024 (UTC). if it is out of date.

Reports

Bot-reported

• 208.102.161.225 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 384 five times in the last 5 minutes (Addition of bad words or other vandalism, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 06:53, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

User-reported

• CyberIdris (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – In article "Yukio Mishima", this user has repeatedly engaged in destructive behavior by replacing basic information based on legitimate sources to his/her original inaccurate research. ([1]) No matter how many times I explain it to this user in the article's note page and elsewhere, he/she has not understood at all, and has continued to force through strange changes and has not stop this exhausting behavior.--みしまるもも (talk) 05:47, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

  This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Spencer^T•C 06:29, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

  I have already explained to this user many times on the message board and in the article notes, but this user has ignored it and made destructive changes. Such continued changes by person who has no basic knowledge of the article, isn't it clearly acts of destruction? I'm so tired now and I don't know what to do. みしまるもも (talk) 07:09, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

  It may be disruptive editing, but not all disruptive editing is vandalism. I agree that ANI is the correct venue for this. --Chris | Crazycomputers (talk) 07:22, 10 November 2024 (UTC)